> > This assumes perfect implementation of the cryptography and the
> > manner in which cryptography is used (and the whole rest of the
> > system). Schneier teaches us that this is a highly unlikely
> > situation to occur anywhere.
>
> I'm teching you Schneier (whoever he is) is wrong, then.
I am not too sure that Bruce made quite the point originally stated,
and if he did make it one should take a look at some other statements
Bruce has been known to state before necessarily taking his word as
gospel.
In fact I would suspect that a more accurate representation of
Bruce's position would be 'think about the protocol, don't depend
on dogma, including dogma that you might find attributed to me.'
Phill
