Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

>       during meeting presentation RFC1101-like hack was proposed.
>       my take is:
>       (1) it is very bad for getaddrinfo/getnameinfo to synthesize things.
>       (2) see draft-ietf-dnsop-inaddr-required-04.txt, reverse mapping is
>           not required.
>       (3) it is too late to change getaddrinfo/getnameinfo behavior.
> 
>       so don't do it.

I fully agree with this. Most of the justification for this is to
support broken applications that barf when they fail to do the reverse
lookup. This is a problem with the broken applications that we should
not compromise the infrastructure to avoid fixing.

Johan Ihr�n
Autonomica

#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Reply via email to