For the sake of discussion, here is what I sent to Liman on Wednesday:
Liman,
I would like to have more discussions about IPv6 DNS
focussed on reverse path DNS. I think it is important
to understand what people want to do about this.
I will update my draft and write a new one presenting
the RFC1101-based idea that was discussed in the mailing
list before Atlanta.
- Alain.
On Thursday, February 13, 2003, at 03:42 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
I guess you want to meet in San Francisco. For that we need an
agenda.
What do _you_ want to see on the agenda?
ipv6 data and dual-stack server coexistence
Perhaps you can elaborate this time. Thanks..
dnsop needs to do major work to defind the operational mechanisms and
practices for v4/v6 coexistence. the charter was to be changed to
reflect this many moons ago. this needs to be done now. and then the
meeting should focus on this.
randy
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
