On Fri, 2003-02-21 at 01:46, Jim Reid wrote:
> >>>>> "Ed" == Ed Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
>     Ed> I want my systems to be as secure from attack as possible. To
>     Ed> me, this means never allowing both functions to be provided by
>     Ed> the same codebase.
> 
> Fine. But by the same reasoning, you wouldn't want to provide both
> functions on the same box.

I can run both processes in the same computer safely because each
is running as a different non-root user and each is chrooted to
a different place in the file system. If I'm really paranoid, I
can run each in its own Linux virtual machine (UML) - all the while
using only one IP address.

> Beats changing the whole internet, no?

I suspect my response to this comment would be unpopular here.

-- 
Ed Sawicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ALC

#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Reply via email to