--- Daniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi folks > > At the yesterday dnsop meeting, we had a time for > discussion > of " IPv6 DNS Discovery based on ND", but we didn't > decide > any definitely consensus at all. > > We (Luc,Paul,Syam, and Daniel) will merge our > related draft into > one draft which will be focused on IPv6 DNS > Discovery not autoregistration > , since IPv6 autoregistration is not mature state at > this time. > Absolutely, I agree with Daniel.
> I believe this approach is not duplicated method > with DHCPv6. As bob's presentation, > it was not IPv6 Stateless Autoconfiguration without > IPv6 DNS Discovery. > Before IPv6 wg is closed, we need to finish IPv6 stateless autoconfiguration, including DNS discovery. Many of IPv6 guys really want to see RA-based DNS discovery used. DHCPv6 and RA-based solutions depend on the selection of network managers or users. Anyone of them is not absolute, I think. As Bob said yesterday, we should finish the recursive argument about DNS discovery and complete the stateless autoconfiguration. Now, I think, DNSOP chairmen should decide if RA-based approach has to be working item or not. I would like to see DNSOP chairmen's opinion. /Jaehoon Paul > Please be sure, Even if DHCPv6 has a prefix option, > we still use a RA option for IPv6 Prefix. > > IPv6 must have all required parameters for > autoconfiguration including IPv6 DNS Discovery > option. > > > Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park) > Mobile Platform Lab. Samsung Electronics > TEL:+82-31-200-4508 FAX:+82-31-200-3147 > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > # To unsubscribe, send a message to > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com #---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
