Luc;
> > Read the draft on security considerations and never say autoconfigured
> > security.
> I've just read quickly you draft.
Do read the draft, carefully and thoroughly.
> First point,
> I'm impressed that you dare say that you ask client to use no security.
NO.
> (I hope I have missed nothing).
You have missed all.
> I do know if we should
> impose cryptography in all IP datagrams, but I feel that IETF want to
> propose the option if needed.
Yup.
> Second point,
> I guess if Firewall will must be aware of anycast way of working,
No.
> because incoming datagrams may not have a source address = to anycast
> destination address of outcoming datagrams. Did I miss something ?
A site is free to have any policy on its firewalls.
The site may simply believe its ISP.
> Third point,
> servers and client will must be able to manage anycast address in
> different manner if UPd or TCP is used.
Wrong. Read the draft and RFC103[45].
Masataka Ohta
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
