[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Rob Austein) writes:

> Ignoring irrelevant issues (eg, the IPv6 Site-Local swamp), I still
> have concerns with the well-known address approach:
> ...

I agree with Rob's objections to this approach.  Asking for a well known
address for DNS begs questions like, why do we need to use IRDP or DHCP to
tell a host its default router -- we can just designate the all-zeroes
address in any given subnet for "default route service".  And so on.  This
way lies madness, and we need a layer of indirection where policy can be
localized.
-- 
Paul Vixie
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

Reply via email to