ok Matt, thanks for the clarification. > -----Message d'origine----- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoye : jeudi 6 novembre 2003 09:35 > A : BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : RE: How IPv6 host gets DNS address > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: BELOEIL Luc FTRD/DMI/CAE > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: 06 November 2003 08:17 > > > I agree with Ralph, in some deployement model, DHCPv6 is the > > right solution to be deployed. But I also believe that some > > other deployment models would prefer other solution like a ND > > model + a simple way to discover DNS resolvers addresses > > (DHCPv6-lite, well-known addresses or RA-based solution). > > Let's not confuse matters. Ralph's statement was referring to > the use of > DHCPv6 for address assignment. The discussion about > appropriate/desirable solutions for recursive name server discovery is > unrelated to that. > > Mat >
#---------------------------------------------------------------------- # To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
