> > too bad we could not reach consensus on DNS dicovery. i will do
> > IPv6 tutorial at LACNIC next week, and again i will need to tell
> > participants that there's no standard mechanism for DNS server
> > configuration.
> I'm not at IETF this week, but I'm following this from home.
>
> Your last statement is not 100% true. We already have DHCPv6 as an RFC.
> The DHCPv6-lite is fundamentally a collection of hints to create a
> simplified
> implementation. So, there is already a standardized solution.
by "no standard mechanism" i meant the lack of consensus in DNS server
configuration mechanism. yes, you are right, dhcpv6 is already an RFC.
itojun
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
