>>>>> On Wed, 19 Nov 2003 02:45:12 +0900 (JST),
>>>>> Yasuhiro Orange Morishita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>> draft-morishita-dnsop-misbehavior-against-aaaa-00.txt
>> a WG document. This is a very important issue to cover.
>>
>> Agreement/objections?
> Thank you for your comment. I'm glad to read this.
> I agree of course.
> Jinmei-san, do we update the draft according to the current situation?
I don't have an objection to making our draft as a wg document, and
yes, I'm willing to work on updating the draft if necessary.
Before doing this, however, I'd like to be sure about several points.
- what's the goal of this draft as a wg document? An informational
RFC (whether a separate document or a part of another doc)? Though
I believe our draft provides useful information, I'm not sure if the
goal is the publication as an RFC (I'm just wondering, not making an
objection to the publication). If we are *not* going to publish the
document, I don't see the strong need for revising the draft as a wg
doc.
- if we are going to publish the document, we should remove concrete
domain names and particular implementations, as Rob pointed out.
(BTW: we, the authors, thought it might not be appropriate to
describe live examples even in an I-D. However, we finally decided
to do so for this particular issue since otherwise the value of the
document would be reduced much).
- when we revise the draft, either as an individual or a wg doc, we'll
probably need to change the title to a more general one for the
reason that Ohta-san and Rob pointed out (I thought Pekka already
pointed this out when he first made comments on the document). The
wording of the draft will also need to be adjusted accordingly.
- because of the previous point, I don't think this document should be
merged into the ipv6-dns-issues draft. It may be a part of other
document talking about general misbehavior issues, such as
draft-ietf-dnsop-bad-dns-res-01. I don't have a particular opinion
on this, but in any event, I guess it's better to revise our draft
(if necessary) separately at the moment.
JINMEI, Tatuya
Communication Platform Lab.
Corporate R&D Center, Toshiba Corp.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
#----------------------------------------------------------------------
# To unsubscribe, send a message to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
