On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:06:26PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 83 lines which said:
> First, I would like to say that I believe it is important to have a > stable and reviewed document about this response size issue since it > is one we'll typically have to deal with in the future (IPv6, > DNSsec, IDN, etc). > > This is specially important since worries about response sizes have > already been used to back political decisions. Do note that issues about response size did not prevent ICANN to create this night a TLD with a NS records RRset of 480 bytes... May be noone worries any more about DNS response size? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
