On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 10:47:44 -0600 Danny McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps expanding in the "Problem Description" section > would be beneficial. Something mentioning that Many > SOHO and broadband access devices provide some flavor > of name resolution services (e.g., there are 4 flavors > outlined by JKT and others; Recursive, Forwarder, Caching- > only and Restricted). Since this group can be a bit pedantic about terminology, what Danny is referencing is what I was specifically referring to as "resolvers". I totally made up those four categories for my purposes of describing some of the work we were doing as a simple way to describe what we've seen in responses to probes. > E.g., 16M recursive "type" servers, , with 800k or so being > the larger problem. Also, some references that provide usual > information on actual numbers, such as John's work here: Can you explain what you mean by the 800k being the larger problem? I presume you're referring to the observation that the majority of resolvers on the net are forwarding to that smaller pool. I might argue that the bigger problem is not with the 800k pool. John _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
