On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 11:27:07PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 52 lines which said:
> (for instance, hostname.as112.net could be replaced by the protocol > which will instantiate RFC 4892). Now that we have RFC 5001 and since this specific issue does not seem handled in draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-01.txt, I would like to repost my suggested text, for inclusion in the above draft: > This document explicits the *current* practices of AS112 operators > and does not claim these practices are ideal. Its purpose is to > inform the community about the actual working of AS112, not to > normalize best practices. Advices? _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
