On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> directly to say that the only solution is to allow ORNS, ignoring the
> other solutions mentioned in the draft.
Instead of more tedious acronyms and jargon, how about just using 'open
recursors' to mean 'open recursors'?
Anyway, the comment was good. It is the solutions in the draft that are
bad, for the reasons explained in the comment.
The notion that 'no one needs open recursors' has not been supported by
clear analysis in the draft. There are legitimate reasons to run open
recursors. I think a lot of people on DNSOP share this view.
--Dean
--
Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
