I oppose this document. I won't go into details since none of my
objections have ever been addressed, other than to say "We addressed
your objection" with a frivolous change or no change at all. Reposting
the details seems an utter waste of time.
If this document is eventually approved by the WG, I will file a
detailed objection with the IESG. I see no point in further detailed
discussion until that event transpires, except to note that I remain
opposed. I don't expect my opposition to change unless the previously
noted problems are addressed, and so far, they've either been ignored or
frivolously handled. I believe the objections of others have also been
ignored or frivolously handled.
Thanks,
--Dean
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008, Peter Koch wrote:
> Dear WG,
>
> in accordance with the roadmap posted the other day, this is to initiate
> a working group last call on
>
> "Considerations for the use of DNS Reverse Mapping"
> draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations-06.txt
>
> ending Friday, 2008-04-04, 18:00 UTC.
>
> The document is aimed at a status of "BCP".
> Please review the draft and send comments and/or statements of support or
> non-support to the WG mailing list. We have taken names of volunteers,
> but everyone is encouraged to review. There will be a five reviewer threshold
> and _no_ default action.
>
> -Peter [co-chair hat on]
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
>
--
Av8 Internet Prepared to pay a premium for better service?
www.av8.net faster, more reliable, better service
617 344 9000
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
