* Alexander Mayrhofer: > As mentioned in the session today, the Enumservices Guide contains some > text on DNS Considerations in section 5.7: > > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide > > The original reason for this text was the "unused" Enumservice, which > conveyed assumptions about the DNS space "below" the record. Suggestions > for changes (or more extensive) text are appreciated.
It might be helpful to include an estimate of the number of bytes typical records will add to the size of the NAPTR response. On our non-DNS related note, I think you reservation of the "X-" namespace is misguided. The only way to reliably prevent standardization of X- names is not to use them in the first place. Once they are in experimental use, and the experiment turns out to be hugely successful, the X- name tends to stick. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
