Mark, On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 07:55:26AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> It's not uncommon for there to be too many PTR records to > cause a problem especially when you start advocating that > each address records needs a corresponding PTR record. The > only reason we don't see more problems is that people have > been saying that it is a waste of time to have multiple PTR > records. Does the current draft's language address worries you have here? A -- Andrew Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 503 667 4564 x104 http://www.commandprompt.com/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
