Adrien de Croy wrote: Allow some "safe" cross-site > cookies? What happens when it doesn't do that? Do people even care > enough about that to live with this solution?
I must admit, I don't see what's wrong with disabling cross-site cookies entirely. If two related domains want to transfer credentials, sessions etc., there are other mechanisms to do it. > In the end what will be the deciding factors? I see users dumping FF3 > when it doesn't work with the websites they know and trust. I see the > reviews bemoaning compatibility issues. Mozilla needs to be careful > when introducing something like this that can create many compatibility > issues where the previous version didn't have them. In the end if some > large jurisdictions refuse to play along, where does that leave > Mozilla's users? Looking for another browser perhaps.. Unless Mozilla > feels it has too many users, I'd urge caution in that area. Perhaps the list should be used to implement a warning, easily overridden per site, like the other cookie dialogs which Mozilla pops up, rather than a hard block. As a user I might prefer that. I already like being able to say "no thanks" to cookies on sites where I don't see any need. -- Jamie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
