[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Brian Dickson) writes: > Are you certain? (And does RCODE 3 mean, as I understand it, NXDOMAIN?)
i mean of course ANCOUNT=0 RCODE=0, thank you for your correction. > Again, hypothetically, what values for such an A RR would cause benign > behaviour? E.g. 127.0.0.1? > > Just thinking *way* outside the box.... i think that if LOCALHOST. could be made to return A 127.0.0.1 and AAAA ::1 then we could use LOCALHOST. as a meaningless value for SOA.MNAME, but that would just be there to handle the case where RFC 2136 initiators were talking to an SOA.MNAME that did not match any NS.NSDNAME, in which case they are already out of spec and it's difficult to say how much effort should be spent changing the spec further. -- Paul Vixie _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
