On 25 aug 2008, at 22.24, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > To provide clients with a convenient way of learning about the policy > statements, I think I'll need a facility that I can be fairly sure the > client could use. One that has occurred to me is the S-NAPTR > approach, as defined in RFC 3958. My model in that case is roughly > that of IRIS. (A variant is the simpler SRV record, but the problem > is the same.)
Personally, I think in this case it is better to for example have a URI RR (see draft-faltstrom-uri-01.txt) that refer to some XML blob where the policy is presented. _policy._idn.se. IN URI 10 10 "http://www.iis.se/idn/idnpolicy.xml"; > I am aware that there are some who think non-delegation records in > zones at the top level at least are a really bad idea. This can be resolved by having NS records for _idn.se. Patrik _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
