Bill,
That why in the next paragraph I said:
> If you think that you have an alternative plan for mitigating this
> attack, you might be able to resurrect open resolvers with a new draft
> that describes this mitigation.
Also, if Dean feels that the alternative mitigation is so compelling
that he could muster WG consensus around it, he has until this Friday to
describe the mitigation on the mailing list.
Ron
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:00:09PM -0400, Ron Bonica wrote:
>> If you believed that there were better mitigations, you should have
>> written a competing draft years ago when the issue was under
>> consideration. At this point, it is a little late in the process to jump
>> up and say "I have a better idea!".
>>
>
> Ron,
> This is not the first time I've heard that arguement and it
> -always- strikes me as being dismissive and ignoring potential
> contribution.
> To develop and grow, one must encourage new ideas and rethinking old
> ones
> because the underlaying assumptions might have changed. I'm persuaded
> that its never too late to jump up and say 'I (think) I have a better
> idea!'
>
> --bill
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
