Roy Arends wrote:
On Feb 28, 2009, at 2:59 PM, TSG wrote:
Roy Arends wrote:
On Feb 25, 2009, at 9:44 PM, Alfred HÎnes wrote:
Question to the WG :
------------------
Are there any convincing reasons for *not* advancing that draft
in a reasonable timeframe now?
I can't see any.
Small terminology nit, but will burn a separate subject line for
that to be thread safe.
+1 for advancing that draft in a reasonable timeframe now.
Roy
Roy - I can see a reason - if you "block out" the IETF process rules
into a flow-chart you will find that the publishing of v08 of this
draft changed the v07 specification - and it MUST be fully vetted and
then interoperability proven for each new revision of the Protocol.
Todd,
"convincing" is the keyword in Alfred's question.
Roy
So then Roy - you are saying that the IETF is not bound by its own
process definitions? Cool -
Todd
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
