At 07:01 07-03-2009, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
I'm not sure I understand the worry here: the document reads perfectly
clearly, to my eyes, that other organizations may have something to
say about actual TLDs; the draft is only about the _technical_
specification of what may be in the TLD.
I don't have any concern as long as the draft is clearly read as
being about a technical specification and that it is understood that
other organizations might have something to say about actual TLDs.
No: 'and it MUST start with an ASCII "letter"'. Therefore, it can't
be numeric only. In another thread I've been playing devil's
advocate, attempting to see if there is any argument for weakening
that position. So far, none, I'm delighted to say.
I'm glad to see that we won't have to go through a long discussion
about numeric host names for this draft. :-)
Are the words "name" and "label" used interchangeably in this draft?
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
