Another (sorry!) nit in draft-ietf-dnsop-as112-ops-02:
There are inconsistencies in which of these two URLs is the preferred one to be put in the informational TXT records: http://as112.net/ http://www.as112.net/ In fact, as the DNS is at the moment, the first works only by virtue of browser guesswork (there is no address record for as112.net). Not that I can get any response out of www.as112.net = 204.152.184.180 at the moment, either ... :-( -- Chris Thompson Email: [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
