Antoin Verschuren wrote: > Hi All, > > I have drafted some new proposed text for section 4.4.5 of RFC4641bis. > I tried to bring some more structure to the section while maintaining most of > the text from the current iteration of the document. > It now clearly separates: > -Definition of terms > -Problem statement > -3 possible solutions for specific use cases. > I also tried to stick with a correct definition of terms and not mix up the > roles of DNS operator and registrar. > > I've included some wording about timing issues to have a step by step guide. > I would like to have some discussion on: > -Are they actually correct ? > -Do they need to be covered here or in draft-morris-dnsop-dnssec-key-timing ? > (should they be mentioned here in brief with a detailed explanation in > draft-morris-dnsop-dnssec-key-timing, or should they be left out all together) > >
Looks ok to me - at least I haven't thought of anything wrong with it at the moment :) I would prefer them here simply to make life easier - non-DNS-geeks will want to read 1 guide, not a bunch of RFC's. So I would really go with "mention here in brief with the ref to draft-morris-dnsops-dnssec-key-timing". Scott _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
