On Oct 7 2009, joao damas wrote:
On 7 Oct 2009, at 13:35, Jim Reid wrote:
On 7 Oct 2009, at 13:13, Roy Arends wrote:
Since a date was announced yesterday (July 1st) for a fully
deployed signed root, can we expect ITAR to Go Away on Januari 1st
2011 ?
Will DLV go away then too?
DLV doesn't only address the lack of a signed root. In fact I would
argue that the (un)signed root is the smallest of the problems it
addresses.
Well, no doubt Jim would *like* it to go away, as I have had his "DLV is evil"
lecture delivered to me on a previous occasion :-)
We have had at least one person from ISC in the past saying they won't be
in any hurry to get rid of dlv.isc.org just because the root is signed.
[I'll try and find the reference(s) if anyone doubts that.] No doubt
they will stop importing the IANA ITAR into it at some stage, though.
There's an interesting technical question about DLV in this context, by
the way. Would a DLV rrset at the apex (e.g. for dlv.isc.org) work as
a substitute for an explicit root zone trust anchor?
--
Chris Thompson University of Cambridge Computing Service,
Email: [email protected] New Museums Site, Cambridge CB2 3QH,
Phone: +44 1223 334715 United Kingdom.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
