On 2009-10-08, at 17:13, Chris Hills wrote:
On 06/10/09 03:30, [email protected] wrote:
Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses which
are not globally unique. Examples are the addresses designated in
RFC1918 for private use within individual sites.
Should this be extended to include RFC4193 unique local ipv6 unicast
addresses (i.e. [cd].f.ip6.arpa.)?
I seem to remember having that discussion a long time ago, maybe in
concert with discussion of marka's local-zones draft.
I believe the consensus at the time was that we didn't have a good
mechanism for adding delegations to as112 servers.
If this is something that the wg as a whole has started to think is
worth working on, I could donate some cycles.
Joe
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
