----- Original Message -----
From: "Alfred H�nes" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 9:53 PM
Subject: [DNSOP] draft-yao-dnsop-idntld-implementation-00 and DNAME
> Authors:
>
> I fear that Sections 3 ff. of draft-yao-dnsop-idntld-implementation-00
> have entirely missed the evolution of the dnesext-rfc2672-dname draft.
>
> The "Understand DNAME" bit, and hence the dependence on EDNS has been
> removed in June, and it has been reinforced that support for DNAME
> does not require support for EDNS0 (although recent empirical data
> have shown that ENDS0 support is almost pervasive for authoritative
> servers and recursive resolvers in these days, and, as you know,
> IPv6 makes EDNS0 effectively mandatory, and DNSSEC does the same).
>
> This clarification of RFC 2672 has the support of major implementors
> and implementations.
>
> I suppose that this evolution has made moot much of the discussion
> in your draft. So please could you revise it based on the current
> understanding of DNAME ?
ok, I will do some updatings.
>
> Namedroppers:
>
> What's the state of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname ?
> IIRC, there was no substantial discussion on the list since -17
> has been posted in September.
> Are the chairs now working on bringing that draft to the IESG?
>
> DNSOP folks:
>
> Are there sound empirical data on DNAME support at large?
>
> Reportedly, DNAME already is in heavy use in ENUM deployments.
> I've never heard complaints from ENUM folks about issues with
> DNAME -- or did I miss smething?
enum is not widely deployed. as far as I know, there are few enum users in the
world.
>
>
> Kind regards,
> Alfred H�nes.
>
> --
>
> +------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
> | TR-Sys Alfred Hoenes | Alfred Hoenes Dipl.-Math., Dipl.-Phys. |
> | Gerlinger Strasse 12 | Phone: (+49)7156/9635-0, Fax: -18 |
> | D-71254 Ditzingen | E-Mail: [email protected] |
> +------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
