I have studied the draft proposing a new 'regular' naming scheme
for the IN-ADDR.ARPA. and IP6.ARPA. zone,
draft-jabley-reverse-servers-00 ,
and fully support this proposal.
Nits I found in the draft:
(1) Abstract
| ... These zones contain data which facilitates reverse mapping ...
--- ^^^
| ... These zones contain data which facilitate reverse mapping ...
^^
(2) Section 1, 2th para
This document specifies a dedicated and stable set of nameserver
| names for each of the IN-ADDR.ARP and IP6.ARPA zones.
--- ^^
This document specifies a dedicated and stable set of nameserver
| names for each of the IN-ADDR.ARPA and IP6.ARPA zones.
^^^
(3) Appendix B.2.2
There are a couple of copyedit flaws, missing necessary changes
relative to B.2.1, in particular:
- all instances of "IN-ADDR.ARP" should be "IP6.ARPA";
- the parenthetical clause in the 2nd bullet #1,
"(which is not authoritative for the IN-ADDR.ARPA zone)",
is irrelevant in this context and should be deleted.
[ please check ]
Kind regards,
Alfred.
--
+------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
| TR-Sys Alfred Hoenes | Alfred Hoenes Dipl.-Math., Dipl.-Phys. |
| Gerlinger Strasse 12 | Phone: (+49)7156/9635-0, Fax: -18 |
| D-71254 Ditzingen | E-Mail: [email protected] |
+------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
