On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 01:46:58PM -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2009, [email protected] wrote:
>
> >There has been some discussion of late about DNS MTU sizing and EDNS0
> >"fall-back".
> >I've found another "culprit" in the program DNSMASQ - distributed with
> >FedoraCore 10
> >and later versions of RedHat.
> >
> >to wit:
> >
> > -P, --edns-packet-max=<size>
> > Specify the largest EDNS.0 UDP packet which is supported by
> > the DNS for-
> > warder. Defaults to 1280, which is the RFC2671-recommended
> > maximum for eth-
> > ernet.
> >
> >Is there any interest in revisting this RFC or should we be happy with a
> >functional limit
> >on EDNS0 message size being 1280 bytes?
>
> I could talk to the Fedora maintainer to see if we can change the default
> using a /etc/sysconfig/dnsmasq parameter.
>
> Paul
that might work ... for this particular instance but who else will read
that text and make the same choice for their application?
--bill
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
