On Feb 23, 2010, at 6:26 AM, Todd Glassey wrote: > Sorry folks - but disclosure is the rule - so something about the potential > hash collision needs to be in the document and there are liability issues for > the people and their sponsor's involved who vote to keep these types of key > factor's out of the work products because they dont want their documents > soiled by 'statements that the lifetime of the Intellectual Property is > limited' which is what putting anything about why the thing may not work does > IMHO.
SHA1 is 160B output size. Do you really expect zones with 2^80 entries in them (the point when the birthday paradox limit start mattering)? One in a septillion probabilities on human-scale items is zero for any reasonable value of zero. There is no liability here. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
