On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 01:40:53PM +1300, Jay Daley wrote:
> > there is a problem w/ cut/paste ... surely we could do better than that?
>
> I'm sure we could and an automated update of DS records is a good idea. But
> my point is that in the absence of a similar automated mechanism for NS
> records we use cut and paste and it works fine and there is nothing about DS
> records that is any more complicated so cut and paste would work fine there
> too.
>
> Jay
the trick there is that an NS update is somewhat humanly parsable. if
a cut/paste
cocks up, its fairly easy to tell. in my limited experience, DS
records are not
quite as humanly parsable and a cut/paste error is more likely to slip
through.
--bill
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
