--On 4 March 2010 15:42:40 -0800 Doug Barton <[email protected]> wrote:

The losing registrar is either going to be helpful, or unhelpful. Given
that adding ANY kind of mechanism to enable secure transition of the
domain is extra work without any direct benefit, the answer is
overwhelmingly likely to be "unhelpful." At least in the case of the
gTLD registrars this is an area where ICANN intervention is likely to be
required, and may actually be beneficial.

Partly depends on thick vs. thin registry model though.

Sorry for being dense, but I don't see how.

In a thick registry model, it would be possible for the registrant
to specify a DS key that the registry (rather than registrar) would
store, just like NS records are specified. So if the registrar changes,
there is no registrar involvement re DS keys unless they are deliberately
obnoxious.

--
Alex Bligh
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to