Hi, > EPP is by no means a failure, so I don't want to draw too strongly from > that example. There have been other protocols, like for instance IRIS, > which seemed like good ideas and sound engineering went into them, but > they fell flat on the ground because the real demand wasn't there. What > I am warning against here is thinking that "it would be cool to just > shove a bit here, a flag there, a TSIG over that part" and think that > we've come up with a mechanism that works. This wouldn't be used by the > registration environment, even if it manages to have multiple > implementations, etc., and rises to Draft and Full Standard. If that > happens the IETF may have "succeeded" in producing something to "solve" > DS consistency, but the registration community would still be looking > for something useful and we all would be back at the start of the process. I completely agree with this.
Cheers, Wolfgang _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
