Le 1 avr. 2010 à 00:11, Jason Livingood a écrit : >> ... >> This to me seems like a "cure" worse than the disease. > > That is also a concern I share. > > It seems that have the cart before the horse, so to speak. IMHO, we need to > do the following (and there's no reason they cannot occur rapidly): > > 1 - Develop a clear problem statement that outlines (1) how "broken" users > are defined and (2) what effects this "brokenness" has on these end users > (or other parts of the Internet). > > 2 - Describe all the various methods and tactics by which end user > "brokenness" can be detected. This may include website-based detection, > DNS-query-based detection, or a variety of other methods. > > 3 - Then, after we have agreement on Problem Definition and Problem > Detection, we can measure the problem to understand what the scope or scale > of the problem is.
> 4 - After we understand Problem Definition, Problem Detection, and Problem > Scope, then you can arrive at possible solutions. Seems like in this case > we sort of *started* here, which concerns me and I think we need to be > careful that discussion thus far does not constrain development of a full > list of Solution Options. +1 for all what precedes. > I further believe we will need to encourage the > pursuit of multiple solutions simultaneously. To be seen. One standard solution, if sufficient, is in general better than a shopping list. > Lastly, just because end user > software upgrades may be difficult doesn't mean we shouldn't do them and > shouldn't focus just as much energy on those than other options. +1 RD _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
