Igor, I have a feeling that the energy spent on defending *now* your proposed "solution" would better be spent providing asap details on the problem you are trying to solve, i.e. explaining which OS does what exactly, in which circumstances, to break what?
Le 31 mars 2010 à 23:19, Igor Gashinsky a écrit : > This is *exactly* what I'm proposing -- all my presentation does is > document this as a feature and describes how it will work (the switch is > actually "disable-aaaa-on-v4-transport")... > .... the only question > is if you do this for all users, a subset of them, or none at all, and > that's going to be up to every individual ISP to do what is right for > them.. Right, each ISP is free to limit, in its own way, services it offers. But the fact is that some dual-stack hosts that today reach Google in IPv6 on Free's network would not be able to do it on a network whose DNS does what you propose. Regards, RD P.S.: Note that "disable-aaaa-on-v4-IP" would be more appropriate terminology than "disable-aaaa-on-v4-transport". (UDP the transport layer used by the DNS is IPvX agnostic. IPv4/IPv6 is an IP matter, at the network layer.) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
