On 2010-04-06, at 09:22, Alfred HÎnes wrote: > The 4th paragraph of that section in the draft says: > > | This document also ignores IP6.INT. IP6.INT has been wound up with > | only legacy resolvers now generating reverse queries under IP6.INT > | [RFC4159].
I also think the text above could be improved: "wound up" is an ambiguous phrase, and the bare reference to 4159 does not make it obvious to readers that the name (and its use in the v6 reverse tree) has been deprecated unless the reader is in the habit of jumping for footnotes. > | This document also ignores IP6.INT, which initially hosted the IPv6 > | reverse DNS tree but does not exist any more, after it had been > | demissed by [RFC4159]. IP6.INT has been wound up with only legacy > | resolvers now generating reverse queries under IP6.INT. "IP6.INT was once used to provide reverse mapping for IPv6. IP6.INT was deprecated in [RFC4159] and the delegation removed from the INT zone in June 2006. While it is possible that legacy software continues to send queries for names under the IP6.INT domain, this document does not specify that IP6.INT be considered a local zone." Joe _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
