In message <[email protected].>, [email protected] roshi.com writes: > On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 02:52:01PM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote: > > > > The zones are consistant with RFC5735 and with operational practice. > > > > > So the question - how common do we expect /32 delegations to become in f > utur > > > e? > > > > From IN-ADDR.ARPA or from some other zone to handle /25-/32 sized > > delegations without using the techniques in RFC2317? I know there > > are people that argue that one shouldn't do RFC2317 style delegations > > so for the latter I would say a lot. For the former I don't expect > > any unless we create special purpose blocks smaller than /24. > > if you allow 255.255.255.255.in-addr.arpa. -AS A ZONE-
Bill, the DNS has always allowed 255.255.255.255.IN-ADDR.ARPA as a zone or any other reverse lookup name. Just because some people thought that it wasn't possible didn't make it fact. It also didn't mean that it hadn't been done for years and years. > then i am much more confortable shreding a /24 into > 255 component zones - You don't need to shred it. Just delegate the one zone. > RFC2317 is designed to do a cut > in the in-addr.arpa space on non-octet alined boundaries > and since you have demo'd (other than me) the use of > a zone cut on octet bounds lt /24, I'm a happy camper. Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
