On Jun 10, 2010 at 17:38 +0200, Shane Kerr wrote:
=>On Mon, 2010-05-31 at 10:25 +0100, Stephen Morris wrote:
=>> I think the local zones draft is just about there, but a couple more
=>> questions:
=>> 
=>> The last revision included the ORCHID addresses.  They are not
=>> routable but, unusually, they are time-limited - the assignment is set
=>> to be revoked in 2014.  So there is the question as to whether the
=>> address range should be in the draft (or should be marked with this
=>> caveat).
=>> 
=>> The ORCHID address range is taken from the IANA special purpose IPv6
=>> address block, which is reserved - amongst other things - for testing
=>> and experimental use.  Currently it also includes address assignments
=>> for TEREDO and benchmarking.  Should the draft mention this address
=>> range and/or these assignments?
=>
=>I think excluding testing & experimental addresses is potentially
=>dangerous. For example, it is possible that one of these may need DNS
=>for an Internet-wide experiment.
=>
=>In any case, I don't think there is much benefit by including these
=>blocks. I propose the ORCHID and the rest of the special purpose IPv6
=>addresses be left out of the list of local zones, and treated normally.

Raising hand timidly....

Instead of listing the zones in section 4 (which then will get hard 
coded into implementations), follow section 6 and register the zones in 
the new/to-be-created IANA assignment registry.  This will force 
implementations to go look at the assignment registry and maybe more 
aware of the dynamic nature of some of these zones.  As the draft is 
now, some implementors probably will stop reading after section 5. :(


-- 
***********************************************************************
Derek Diget                            Office of Information Technology
Western Michigan University - Kalamazoo  Michigan  USA - www.wmich.edu/
***********************************************************************
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to