At 14:22 +0200 6/15/10, <[email protected]> wrote:
Peter asked me to solicit this group for opinions and thoughts.
A comment independent of your (Teemu's) effort.
The DNSOP group has considered but never adopted a draft (nor any
documented promoted to RFC) that defined what split DNS is. Without
a definition of split DNS, commenting on its complications for
multi-homed devices will probably cause rat holing.
The group has to define split DNS.
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnaswamy-dnsop-dnssec-split-view/
(Last update more than three years ago.)
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-savolainen-mif-dns-server-selection/
As I haven't read the above document and although I do have a sketchy
appreciation of the issue, I'll withhold any comments on said (unread
by me) document until I can get the time. It looks interesting.
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Edward Lewis
NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468
Discussing IPv4 address policy is like deciding what to eat on the Titanic.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
