> Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:36:17 +0000 > From: bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com > > we tried this a couple time last decade with limited success. (pre > SRV). it would work, if and only if there were general agreement by > the zone admins to actually keep up w/ the data.
while i expect that it would be a gateway rather than a data transform, and while i agree that if it's a data transform then it should be done often enough to not get out of date, i note that i'm asking a different question than "would it work". i'm wondering if there's enough interest to have it be worth writing it up as a dns schema so that interested producers and consumers of this information in this form can have a standard rendezvous (qname format) and delivery system (TXT formats). that's not "would it work". it's "could it ever be useful to anybody". i am not trying to get input on technical feasibility since i think that's pretty obvious. nor am i trying to get input on governance like should registries be required by icann to implement it or should icann implement it for root, arpa, and other non-delegated zones. just "is there interest". _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
