-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
In message <[email protected]>, Doug Barton
<[email protected]> writes
>On 11/25/2010 09:52, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
>> It seems to me that those who don't like the document
>> aren't actually offering text that they'd like to see in the document.
>
>You may recall that my first post on the topic did actually offer a
>diff. My intention was to be minimalistic to avoid changing the text too
>much at this stage, but as I just posted I like the direction Tony is
>going much better.
as did I ... but I wish he'd carried on, because I'd like to see a
chatty explanation of what the explicit rules meant before suddenly
diving into the excruciating detail of { Ll, Lo, Lm, Mn } etc
ie: I would like to be able to read this RFC and understand in general
terms what it meant without ever bothering to look at 5890 (or it seems,
since that isn't the right place, at several other RFCs as well)
ie: the only people who'd need to follow the references would be those
who were proposing something challenging like .666, .3d or .4men (and
especially the cyrillic equivalents of these) and who wanted to know if
this was likely to lead to tears before bedtime.
- --
richard @ highwayman . com "Nothing seems the same
Still you never see the change from day to day
And no-one notices the customs slip away"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.7.1
iQA/AwUBTPArB5oAxkTY1oPiEQL98gCfS/qmOpFAe7ayxe+I1eFTTDRYLC0AnA5H
53MsjYbtMqTG9NLA6Ff7lGtP
=a44I
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
