On 27 Nov 2010, at 15:57, Joe Abley <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I don't know how to defend an assertion in absolute terms that this
> understanding is categorically wrong. How would you do it?
As I have said before, RFC 1123 is very clear that DISCUSSION sections are for
clarification and explanation. They do not impose requirements that do not
exist in the normative sections.
Under many of the individual topics in this document,
there is parenthetical material labeled "DISCUSSION"
or "IMPLEMENTATION". This material is intended to give
clarification and explanation of the preceding requirements
text. It also includes some suggestions on possible future
directions or developments.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
