On 2 Feb 2011, at 04:18, Phillip Hallam-Baker <[email protected]> wrote: >
I'm glad you think my sheme is reasonably plausible. I'm not sure your idea of a self-assembling committee of witnesses is likely to happen. It seems to me that more deliberate setup will be faster and more likely to succeed. But it requires politics which isn't my area... > So now we have a scheme that is independent of any single point of control. > The only question being the circumstances in which the signers would > legitimately sign something other than the current ICANN root KSK. The same question applies to the root server operators' relationship with ICANN... Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
