-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 19-04-11 19:10, Paul Wouters wrote: > > Perhaps it is worth splitting the non-cooperative in these use cases?
That's excactly what was done in the draft. There was just a mistake of putting the word "non-cooperative" where "cooperative" was meant in the first sentence. And then continues to describe the non-cooperative case. There's realy nothing to describe in the non-cooperative case. If your DNS provider wants to screw up, he can. Be warned. Be consious about it, and sign a good contract with your DNS provider to prevent him from screwing up. That's the only advise we can give. - -- Antoin Verschuren Technical Policy Advisor SIDN Utrechtseweg 310, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands P: +31 26 3525500 F: +31 26 3525505 M: +31 6 23368970 mailto:[email protected] xmpp:[email protected] http://www.sidn.nl/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNrpQwAAoJEDqHrM883AgnvD8H/ApbYptw2MRkuHLcHpkP78jo psno0wFi6hClDxzNTNUxA8iWNQWpEyhWRgsWhceJE0w+kDXaBoXotMKEYKJqcYQH Lvso9z25nRS/qvqx+YLVsr2bFyr6l7SLcVLGY0HmaAOBbWa1jecEB+zTWy8Lh+TO Wyw2xVr37C0BAR9MsLNsoGnZLx3MfzL/GEt8EdbuHYy9uszK9D+8ggw/jPirF6y0 1EREfjpaD1r0DJ+aPd61zN47J/QcLYDKNhK5vm0U4W8UR9S8PDmlCRRfDSkNXClH CfpR36z6yn+3rbxLzPVRBTfwaoIfRIB9XewHt5KHxt929+iYEIIHfc7qSGUmoM8= =DtIO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
