Subject: [DNSOP] Dynamic DNS Update Deployment?? Date: Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 01:32:48AM +0000 Quoting Leo Liu(bing) ([email protected]): > Hi, all > > We used to have a brief discussion about dynamic DNS update in in IPv6 renum > mail list([email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>), and it was considered as a > mechanism to improve renumbering automation greatly. > As we discussed, although RFC3007(Secure DNS Dynamic Update) is reportedly > widely implemented, widely available, and widely interoperable today but not > widely deployed. > So I'm here to ask you DNS pro how about the rfc3007 and rfc2136(Dynamic > Updates in DNS) deployment state in real networks? Do you think they are > worth to be deployed in the name of improving renumbering?
Since every Windows admin / consultant I've spoken to lately insists that Windows DNSes with AD integration be used for anything related to name resolution, and cites dynamic updates as a reason for this, there is some anecdotal evidence that suggests the usage and importance of dynamic updates. Also, one must assume some deployment. -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668 I just heard the SEVENTIES were over!! And I was just getting in touch with my LEISURE SUIT!!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
