Because I am a moron, I forgot to include the links to the reports. They are as follows:
Arabic: <http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-3-07oct11-en.htm> Chinese: <http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-03oct11-en.htm> Cyrillic: <http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-06oct11-en.htm> Devanagari: <http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-03oct11-en.htm> Greek: <http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-07oct11-en.htm> Latin: <http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-07oct11-en.htm> On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 11:08:21AM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > I'm going to send related messages to four IETF lists where I suspect > there might be people who are interested: dnsext, dnsop, apps-discuss, > and idna-update. My apologies to those of you who get it more than > once. > > For those of you who have been following or otherwise interested in > the ICANN Variant Issues Project, the case study reports are up. The > public comment period is open until 14 November. The Project is aimed > at sorting out, for some scripts, what people mean when they talk > about "variant names" in the DNS. > > For this WG, it seems to me that some of the techniques people seem to > be desiring involve potential effects for DNS operation. One group in > particular appears to be suggesting one or more DNAMEs for potentially > every delegation from the root zone when that script is used. The > operational implications lower in the tree might be worth considering. > > As a matter of full disclosure, I point out that I have been involved > with these reports, providing some observations about the (technical) > feasibility of various things people wanted to do. I provided advice, > but of course the teams actually responsible for the reports were free > to do as they wished with my advice (including ignore it). > > I encourage those of you who are interested in the topic to read the > reports and make any comments you think are useful in the public > comment forum, or (for that matter) by discussing things on the open > ICANN list devoted to the project > (https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/vip). Note that the usual > ICANN processes don't include the discussion on the mailing list as > public comments, so if you want your comments to be considered > formally, you'll need to post them in the appropriate area. > > Best regards, > > Andrew > > -- > Andrew Sullivan > [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- Andrew Sullivan [email protected] _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
