On 18 Jan 2012, at 19:41, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 07:14:27PM +0000, > Paul Vixie <[email protected]> wrote > a message of 74 lines which said: > >> in particular, the order in which it's probed (compared to EDNS0 >> UDP, EDNS0 TCP, old style UDP, old style TCP) should be >> specified. the NS RRset gives no hint of the name server's >> capabilities. > > As far as I know, it is not intended to be "probed", Unbound does not > attempt to use this feature with regular zone servers. It is supposed > to be a fixed forwarder that you know and trust, specified in the > configuration file (or via unbound-control), to "tunnel" DNS requests > outside of China/EvilCorporationWithFirewall/France.
To which I reply: Hi Stephane, folks, ... and, with today's SOPA/PIPA froth, outside of the US? Pity -- I had hoped that this was using the dns: URL and an XML format had been defined for the response. [probe would be, I guess do the usual, and if that doesn't work, try port 443 and a dns: URL (or try that first, then ...)] sigh. all the best, Lawrence _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
