SM <[email protected]> wrote: > There is an IESG Note in BCP 44 (RFC 2964) about using .local. RFC 6265 > obsoleted RFC 2965 which contained a similar note. Below are a reply from an > ISP's DNS server for local. : > > local. 10800 IN A [removed] > > Is there any survey about ISP DNS servers returning an answer for such > queries?
That seems rather foolish to me! On my recursive servers, .local is a locally-served empty zone, to avoid leakage problems from mDNS names. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <[email protected]> http://dotat.at/ Shannon: Southerly or southwesterly 5 to 7, but mainly 4 in southeast. Rough. Rain. Moderate, occasionally poor. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
