>>>>> On Thu, 29 Mar 2012 11:17:28 +0200, Edward Lewis <[email protected]> >>>>> said:
EL> Any thoughts on whether the following would be a DNSOP document? I'm EL> asking DNSEXT too. My initial reaction, after reading the title, was "yes, it looks like a good thing". Then I read the document and realized you were pseudo-documenting recent allocated types that may or may not exist in the future and may or may not change in RDATA content before final publication (if any) in the first place. Because of all the unknowns in that list, it doesn't seem wise to formally document a questionable list. In particular, one of the whole reasons behind relaxing the RRTYPE allocation system was to allow more rapid creation of new data types without requiring they be documented (fully). So... I'm leaning toward "no" with a decent chance of being pushed toward "yes" with even a fairly small logic-I-missed shove. -- Wes Hardaker SPARTA, Inc. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
